[Linux-cluster] doubts in Piranha

[mehmet celik]

hi Lon, l have LVS/DR on my network. I don't use the piranha for LVS/DR. But 
I propose piranha for using LVS/NAT. Additionally, if I want to  do network 
tunning, why  do I use  the piranha ???
for this, I use my knowledge on linux..

have a nice day..

Mehmet CELIK
Istanbul/TURKEY

>From: Lon Hohberger <lhh at redhat.com>
>Reply-To: linux clustering <linux-cluster at redhat.com>
>To: linux clustering <linux-cluster at redhat.com>
>Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] doubts in Piranha
>Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:36:22 -0400
>
>On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 05:02:43PM +0200, Tomas Hoger wrote:
> > On 7/11/07, Lon Hohberger <lhh at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >(You can do it in RHCS4 too; I don't know about RHCS3)
> >
> > It's also possible to use LVS-DR on RHEL/RHCS3.
> >
> > Regarding documentation: It only mentions arptables as ARP problem
> > fix.  For kernel 2.6+, there is also another way using sysctl, which
> > does not require additional kernel patches / modules.
>
>There is an IPtables one in the docs too, which works on both 2.4.x and
>2.6.x IIRC.
>
>--
>Lon Hohberger - Software Engineer - Red Hat, Inc.
>
>--
>Linux-cluster mailing list
>Linux-cluster at redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster

_________________________________________________________________
http://newlivehotmail.com