[Linux-cluster] Slowness above 500 RRDs
David Teigland
teigland at redhat.com
Tue Jun 12 18:19:07 UTC 2007
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 05:43:24PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> Let's see. Mounting on one more node (and switching on the third):
>
> # cman_tool services
> type level name id state
> fence 0 default 00010001 none
> [1 2 3]
> dlm 1 clvmd 00020001 none
> [1 2 3]
> dlm 1 test 000a0001 none
> [1 2]
> gfs 2 test 00090001 none
> [1 2]
>
> $ <commands to run the test>
> filecount=500
> iteration=0 elapsed time=5.030971 s
> iteration=1 elapsed time=0.657682 s
> iteration=2 elapsed time=0.798228 s
> iteration=3 elapsed time=0.65742 s
> iteration=4 elapsed time=0.776301 s
> total elapsed time=7.920602 s
>
> Somewhat slower, yes. But still pretty fast.
>
> Mounting on the third node:
>
> # cman_tool services
> type level name id state
> fence 0 default 00010001 none
> [1 2 3]
> dlm 1 clvmd 00020001 none
> [1 2 3]
> dlm 1 test 000a0001 none
> [1 2 3]
> gfs 2 test 00090001 none
> [1 2 3]
>
> $ <commands to run the test>
> filecount=500
> iteration=0 elapsed time=0.822107 s
> iteration=1 elapsed time=0.656789 s
> iteration=2 elapsed time=0.657798 s
> iteration=3 elapsed time=0.881496 s
> iteration=4 elapsed time=0.659481 s
> total elapsed time=3.677671 s
>
> It's much the same...
OK, that's interesting. I was led to believe from some of my old testing
that plocks wouldn't be that fast, but maybe that was a mistaken
conclusion. There's no reason not to use plocks with -l0 if you're
getting good results.
Dave
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list