[Linux-cluster] Slowness above 500 RRDs

David Teigland teigland at redhat.com
Wed Mar 28 16:27:27 UTC 2007


On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 05:48:10PM +0200, Wagner Ferenc wrote:
> Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> writes:
> 
> > There's a good bunch of RRDs in a directory.  A script scans them for
> > their last modification times, and then updates each in turn for a
> > couple of times.  The number of files scanned and the length of the
> > update rounds are printed.  The results are much different for 500 and
> > 501 files:
> >
> > filecount=501
> >   iteration=0 elapsed time=10.425568 s
> >   iteration=1 elapsed time= 9.766178 s
> >   iteration=2 elapsed time=20.14514 s
> >   iteration=3 elapsed time= 2.991397 s
> >   iteration=4 elapsed time=20.496422 s
> > total elapsed time=63.824705 s
> >
> > filecount=500
> >   iteration=0 elapsed time=6.560811 s
> >   iteration=1 elapsed time=0.229375 s
> >   iteration=2 elapsed time=0.202973 s
> >   iteration=3 elapsed time=0.203439 s
> >   iteration=4 elapsed time=0.203095 s
> > total elapsed time=7.399693 s
> 
> Following up to myself with one more data point: raising
> SHRINK_CACHE_MAX from 1000 to 20000 in gfs/dlm/lock_dlm.h helps
> significantly, but still isn't enough.  Besides, I don't know what I'm
> doing.  Should I tweak the surrounding #defines, too?

SHRINK_CACHE_MAX is related to fcntl posix locks, did you intend to change
the app to use flock (which is much faster that fcntl)?

Dave




More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list