[Linux-cluster] Asymmetric config for two-node cluster with qdisk?
Lon Hohberger
lhh at redhat.com
Fri Mar 30 16:58:05 UTC 2007
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 06:50:34PM +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Should I put some asymmetry in the cluster config (and/or the qdisk
> heuristic scripts) of a two-node cluster to make (only) one node
> decide to continue its services in case of a split-brain problem?
>
> Or are heartbeat failures ignored *if* the quorum disk still shows
> that the other node is running ok (or does this only affect whether
> to fence or not)?
>
> During my tests (disconnecting nodes, shared storage via working)
> I got tons of messages like
>
> qdiskd[4012]: <crit> A master exists, but it's not me?!
> qdiskd[4012]: <crit> Critical Error: More than one master found!
That's fixed in CVS.
-- Lon
--
Lon Hohberger - Software Engineer - Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list