[Linux-cluster] Asymmetric config for two-node cluster with qdisk?

Lon Hohberger lhh at redhat.com
Fri Mar 30 16:58:05 UTC 2007


On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 06:50:34PM +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Should I put some asymmetry in the cluster config (and/or the qdisk
> heuristic scripts) of a two-node cluster to make (only) one node
> decide to continue its services in case of a split-brain problem?
> 
> Or are heartbeat failures ignored *if* the quorum disk still shows
> that the other node is running ok (or does this only affect whether
> to fence or not)?
> 
> During my tests (disconnecting nodes, shared storage via working)
> I got tons of messages like
> 
>   qdiskd[4012]: <crit> A master exists, but it's not me?!
>   qdiskd[4012]: <crit> Critical Error: More than one master found!

That's fixed in CVS.

-- Lon

-- 
Lon Hohberger - Software Engineer - Red Hat, Inc.




More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list