[Linux-cluster] Failover with multiple interfaces
Josh Gray
jgray at nicusa.com
Wed Nov 7 16:56:30 UTC 2007
Oh I must have misunderstood the question.. Yes, the cluster matches up
the virtual ip's to where they should be. I have three different subnets on
three different interfaces and it works great.
Examples:
Vips:
10.0.13.5
10.0.14.5
10.0.15.5
On the servers are:
Node 1 10.0.13.10, 10.0.14.10. 10.0.15.10
Node 2 10.0.13.11, 10.0.14.11. 10.0.15.11
Node 3 10.0.13.12, 10.0.14.12. 10.0.15.12
On 11/7/07 7:30 AM, "Steve Rigler" <srigler at marathonoil.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 14:19 +0000, James Fidell wrote:
>> So, I have my NFS cluster all set up, with NFS services and shared
>> storage all managed over a "private" network.
>>
>> My intention is to join several more nodes to the cluster using the
>> same storage, but providing services other than NFS. Is it possible
>> at the same time to provide services on a "public" network and have
>> floating public IP addresses which are also migrated across the
>> failover domain when the cluster fences a node?
>>
>> Is it just a case of creating a second IP address service in the
>> failover domain? Will the resource manager just "do the right thing"
>> and bind the floating address to the correct network interface?
>>
>> James
>
> James,
>
> In the past we had multiple public interfaces and cluster service was
> smart enough to bind multiple floating IP's to the correct interfaces.
>
> -Steve
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
--
Josh Gray
Systems Administrator
NIC Inc
Email: jgray at nicusa.com
Desk/Mobile: 913-221-1520
"It is not the mountain we conquer, but ourselves."
- Sir Edmund Hillary
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list