[Linux-cluster] I give up

[Scott Becker]

Perhaps I should try it. But it seems like a step backwards. I don't 
have enough hardware to run a cluster and experiment with a test cluster 
to know when I can use the newer system.

    scottb

jakub.suchy at enlogit.cz wrote:
> Scott Becker wrote:
>   
>> Yes, slow at best. This list is better. Support is not the issue. I'm 
>> shooting for 100% uptime with simple failover. There are too many problems 
>> with the software and I'm a month behind schedule. The biggest problem is 
>> the core system is malfunctioning. Smaller problem is that in the same test 
>> I ran into the fencing issue that others have experienced, the menus are 
>> too dynamic for the current fence_apc agent.
>>
>> A month ago I thought, steep learning curve and then I'll be all set. 
>> redhat.com gives the distinct impression that they are selling a completed 
>> solution. I disagree.
>>     
>
> Have you tried RHEL 4.6 cluster? It's setup is really smooth oposite to
> RHEL 5.0, according to my experience. (As I said before, we will be
> trying 5.1 in few days).
>
> Jakub
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20071128/18405571/attachment.htm>