[Linux-cluster] Multiple links to a cluster

Flavio Junior billpp at gmail.com
Fri Dec 12 01:40:36 UTC 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Use channel bonding...

http://www.mjmwired.net/kernel/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt

- --

Flávio do Carmo Júnior aka waKKu


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAklBwRAACgkQgyuXjr6dyku0tQCeOftcgUfJAbnnGeOZu25VA52p
obcAn2egYD9SLjXbHnnNtRlxKRsfXKU8
=3Eg7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Michael O'Sullivan <
michael.osullivan at auckland.ac.nz> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I have been trying to set up a 2-node cluster where both nodes have
> multiple links to the cluster. Initially, I specified two IP addresses for
> each cluster node in /etc/hosts, but this seemed to confuse the fencing and
> make the cluster hang.
>
> Now I am trying to use a link equalizer (TEQL device, see the Linux
> Advanced Routing and Traffic Control - lartc.org for details) which uses a
> single IP address and shares the load across the two links. However, some
> packets may be delivered out of order...
>
> Unfortunately, using the TEQL device makes the 2-node cluster have a
> split-brain problem that I can't seem to remedy. I changed /etc/hosts to use
> one of the actual NICs instead of the TEQL device and got the cluster going,
> but as soon as I go back to the TEQL device node 1 thinks node 2 is offline
> and node 2 thinks node 1 is offline...
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions to fix this? Or alternatives for using a
> single IP address? (Note, I have not used ethernet bonding as it does not
> utilize the full capacity of both links whereas I think TEQL will.)
>
> I'm happy to supply any extra information required. Thanks in advance for
> any help, Mike
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20081211/dca2d3c9/attachment.htm>


More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list