[Linux-cluster] Can clustered RHEL 5 use a SAN with different access rights for different nodes in the cluster?

[pronix pronix]

yes , you can deploy than without gfs,but with gfs2 better
readonly access implement by anonymous (read only) users.
failover possible create - enough 2 nodes and drbd



2008/6/18 Richard Williams - IoDynamix <RichardW at iodynamix.com>:

> Please advise and/or redirect this posting if this is not the correct forum
> for my question - thanks.
>
> A company wants to use clustered rhel5 systems as inside/outside ftp
> servers. Users on the inside (LAN) cluster nodes can read and write to the
> SAN, while users on the outside (DMZ) cluster can only read.
>
> Is this application possible without GFS?
>
> If one node in the cluster fails, can the other node be provisioned to
> provide all services until recovery?
>
> Can a SAN be used as the "single" ftp location for both services (inside
> FTP
> & outside FTP?)
>
> Does the customer need more than four systems (i.e. 2 inside - 2 outside) -
> is a separate "command" system required?
>
>
> Have Dell's m1000e & 600 series blades been certified for this operating
> system?
>
> Is there any documentation available regarding separate access rights for
> multiple nodes in a cluster available?
>
> Thanks for your constructive reply.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20080618/92d21ea9/attachment.htm>