[Linux-cluster] Two node NFS cluster serving multiple networks
Randy Brown
randy.brown at noaa.gov
Thu Mar 13 14:31:34 UTC 2008
FYI - everything worked as I expected. I put a second interface in
each host and configured it for another network. Then, I configured the
resources for this 2nd network and created a separate service
specifically for the resources on this network. So I have a service for
nfs exports to our 91.0 network and another for exports to our 20.0
network. Using different nfs client resources, I can mount rw on one
network and ro on the other, for example. I figured it would work this
way, but I hadn't tested it yet. I must admit I sweating a bit until I
actually saw it work.
Thanks,
Randy
Brian Kroth wrote:
> OK, poorly thought out example.
>
> FYI, in heartbeat you can specify which interface to use for the
> service IP, though like rgmanager, you generally don't have to:
>
> http://www.linux-ha.org/HeartbeatResourceAgent/IPaddr2
> http://www.linux-ha.org/v2/Examples/Simple
>
> Alex Kompel <barbos at gmail.com> 2008-03-12 10:39:
>
>> You will still need some way to tell the system through which
>> interface you want to route outgoing packets for each target.
>> You can achieve the same with greater ease by splitting the network in
>> 2 subnets and assigning each to a single interface.
>> It all depends on the problem you are trying to solve. If you want
>> redundancy - use active-passive bonding, you want throughput - use
>> active-active bonding (if your switch supports link aggregation), if
>> you want security and isolation - use separate subnets.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> 2008/3/12 Brian Kroth <bpkroth at wisc.edu>:
>>
>>> This is a hypothetical, but what if you have two interfaces on the same
>>> network and want to force one service IP to one interface and the other
>>> to a different interface? I think what everyone is wondering is how
>>> much control one has over the service IP placement.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Brian
>>>
>>> Finnur Örn Guðmundsson - TM Software <fog at t.is> 2008-03-12 14:36:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>> >
>>> > I see no reason why you could not have 3 diffrent interfaces, each connected to the networks you are trying to serve the NFS requests to/from. RG Manager will add the floating interfaces to the "correct" interface, that is, if your floating ip is 1.2.3.4 and you have a interface with the IP address 1.2.3.3 he will add the IP to that interface.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Bgrds,
>>> > Finnur
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of gordan at bobich.net
>>> > Sent: 12. mars 2008 14:10
>>> > To: linux clustering
>>> > Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Two node NFS cluster serving multiple networks
>>> >
>>> > Sounds very similar to what I'm trying to achieve (see the other thread
>>> > about binding failover resources to interfaces). I've not seen a response
>>> > yet, so I'm most curious to see if you'll get any.
>>> >
>>> > Gordan
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Randy Brown wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > I am using a two node cluster with Centos 5 with up to date patches. We have
>>> > > three different networks to which I would like to serve nfs mounts from this
>>> > > cluster. Can this even be done? I have interfaces available for each
>>> > > network in each node?
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Linux-cluster mailing list
>>> > Linux-cluster at redhat.com
>>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Linux-cluster mailing list
>>> > Linux-cluster at redhat.com
>>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>>>
>>> --
>>> Linux-cluster mailing list
>>> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Linux-cluster mailing list
>> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> --
>> Linux-cluster mailing list
>> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20080313/9fdb6a12/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: randy_brown.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 313 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20080313/9fdb6a12/attachment.vcf>
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list