[Linux-cluster] Can clustered RHEL 5 use a SAN with differentaccess rights for different nodes in the cluster?

[Harri.Paivaniemi at tietoenator.com]

Hi,

If you have ability (in your storage system) to export that disk also via NFS, it's the simpliest way... you could restrict access just via mount/export perms and no gfs needed... works perfectly in ftp-usage.

-hjp




2008/6/18 Richard Williams - IoDynamix <RichardW at iodynamix.com>:

> Please advise and/or redirect this posting if this is not the correct forum
> for my question - thanks.
>
> A company wants to use clustered rhel5 systems as inside/outside ftp
> servers. Users on the inside (LAN) cluster nodes can read and write to the
> SAN, while users on the outside (DMZ) cluster can only read.
>
> Is this application possible without GFS?
>
> If one node in the cluster fails, can the other node be provisioned to
> provide all services until recovery?
>
> Can a SAN be used as the "single" ftp location for both services (inside
> FTP
> & outside FTP?)
>
> Does the customer need more than four systems (i.e. 2 inside - 2 outside) -
> is a separate "command" system required?
>
>
> Have Dell's m1000e & 600 series blades been certified for this operating
> system?
>
> Is there any documentation available regarding separate access rights for
> multiple nodes in a cluster available?
>
> Thanks for your constructive reply.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 3799 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20081103/850640a6/attachment.bin>