[Linux-cluster] rhcs + gfs performance issues
Gordan Bobic
gordan at bobich.net
Mon Oct 6 17:45:00 UTC 2008
Doug Tucker wrote:
>>> 1) Tru64 and TruCluster with Advfs from 7 years ago is simply that much
>>> more robust and mature than RHES4 and CS/GFS and therefore tremendously
>>> outperforms it...or
>> RHEL4 is quite old. It's been a while since I used it for clustering.
>> RHEL5 has yielded considerably better performance in my experience.
>
> Interesting. The only way I can see upgrading is:
>
> 1) using the upgrade options on the production node (scary, and
> downtime) or
"Upgrade" options never really worked on any OS. I wouldn't bank on it
"just working", especially on something as complex as clustering.
> 2) do you know if RHEL5 will participate in a RHEL4 cluster? if so, I
> could add an RHEL5 node, make it master, and then have the ability to
> upgrade the other 2 one at a time.
No, you can't mix versions. Even different package versions between the
same distro version can cause problems.
>>> 2) We have this badly configured.
>> There isn't all that much to tune on RHEL4 cluster-wise, most of the
>> tweakability has been added more recently than I've last used it. I'd
>> say RHEL5 is certainly worth trying. The problem you are having may just
>> go away.
>
> Bummer!
Worse, you may need to change the GFS file system options for the new
version, so you may end up having to backup/restore the data. I don't
think you can avoid cluster downtime for the upgrade.
Gordan
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list