[Linux-cluster] Two nodes cluster issue without shared storageissue
Chen, Mockey (NSN - CN/Cheng Du)
mockey.chen at nsn.com
Fri Oct 24 02:35:48 UTC 2008
>-----Original Message-----
>From: linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com
>[mailto:linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of ext Lon
>Hohberger
>Sent: 2008年10月24日 0:02
>To: linux clustering
>Subject: Re: [Linux-cluster] Two nodes cluster issue without
>shared storageissue
>
>On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 17:10 +0800, Chen, Mockey (NSN - CN/Cheng Du)
>wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to set up a two node cluster, I use active/standby
>mode to run
>> my service. I need even one node's hardware failure such as
>power cut,
>> another node still can handover from failure node and the
>provide the
>> service.
>>
>> In my environment, I have no shared storage, so I can not use quorum
>> disk. Is there any other way to implement it? I searched and found
>> 'tiebreaker IP' may feed my request, but I can not found any
>hints on
>> how to configure it ?
>
>Since you have no shared data, you may be able to run without fencing.
>
>That should be pretty straightforward, but you might need to
>comment out the "fenced" startup from the cman init script.
>
>In this case, the worst that will happen is both nodes will
>end up running the service at the same time in the event of a
>network partition.
>
>The other down side is that if the cluster divides into two
>partitions and later merges back into one partition, I don't
>think certain things will work right; you will need to detect
>this event and reboot one of the nodes.
>
>-- Lon
I know such defects in two node cluster.
Since our service is mission critical, I want to know how to avoid such failure case ?
Thanks.
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list