[Linux-cluster] Question about performance on gfs2
crypto grid
cryptogrid at gmail.com
Mon Apr 13 19:11:09 UTC 2009
Could you mention please, the benchmarks you are using?
Thanks,
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Alain.Moulle <Alain.Moulle at bull.net> wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have executed some benchs on gfs2, gfs compared to ext3 and ocfs2
> and the results are (just some examples):
>
> * Read on 1 file :
> quite the same performance
>
> * Write on 1 file :
>
> quite the same performance
>
> * Creation of many many files and repertories :
> gfs2 is 10 times less good than ext3 and ocfs2
>
> * Write of a file tree followed by 4 reading process :
> gfs and gfs2 : 40 mn
> ocfs2 : 3 mn
>
> Does it seem normal for you ? or is there some hidden tuning somewhere to
> increase
> performances when using gfs2 (or gfs) ?
>
> Thanks a lot.
> Regards.
> Alain
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20090413/1a0bd917/attachment.htm>
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list