[Linux-cluster] Question about performance on gfs2

crypto grid cryptogrid at gmail.com
Mon Apr 13 19:11:09 UTC 2009


Could you mention please, the benchmarks you are using?

Thanks,

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Alain.Moulle <Alain.Moulle at bull.net> wrote:

>  Hi
>
> We have executed some benchs on gfs2, gfs compared to ext3 and ocfs2
> and the results are (just some examples):
>
> * Read on 1 file   :
>         quite the same performance
>
> * Write on 1 file :
>
> 	quite the same performance
>
> * Creation of many many files and repertories :
>         gfs2 is 10 times less good than ext3 and ocfs2
>
> * Write of a file tree followed by 4 reading process :
>         gfs and gfs2 : 40 mn
>         ocfs2 : 3 mn
>
> Does it seem normal for you ? or is there some hidden tuning somewhere to
> increase
> performances when using gfs2 (or gfs)  ?
>
> Thanks a lot.
> Regards.
> Alain
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20090413/1a0bd917/attachment.htm>


More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list