[Linux-cluster] validity error

[Kaloyan Kovachev]

On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:24:49 +0000, Christine Caulfield wrote
> On 11/12/09 10:21, Kaloyan Kovachev wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:58:38 +0000, Christine Caulfield wrote
> >> On 11/12/09 09:48, Kaloyan Kovachev wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:12:33 +0000, Christine Caulfield wrote
> >>>> On 10/12/09 15:27, Kaloyan Kovachev wrote:
> >>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>     after upgrading to 3.0.6 i get:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Starting cman... Relax-NG validity error : Extra element cman in
interleave
> >>>>>
> >>>>> but cluster.conf should be correct and was working so far without
problems.
> >>>>> The coresponding section in<cluster>    is:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <cman expected_votes="7">
> >>>>>       <multicast addr="239.192.11.81"
keyfile="/etc/cluster/cman_authkey"/>
> >>>>> </cman>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> how should i change it to pass the validity check?
> >>>>
> >>>> Remove the keyfile="" attribute. cman ignores it anyway :-)
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I am sure it was working with RHCM v2, so it seems i will need to
rewrite the
> >>> config for V3, as i get another error now about specifying multicast
interface
> >>> for clusternode and there will be others for sure
> >>
> >> Yes, it would work fine under v2. In fact it's working now - you're just
> >> getting a warning message (I hope!). We have added a lot more checks to
> >> the configuration to try and help invalid configurations from being run
> >> and causing trouble.
> >
> > when starting the cluster i get just warnings, but updating the config and
> > using cman_tool version -r cman doesn't reload it, so i am forced to fix my
> > errors :)
> >
> >>
> >>>> If you need to specify an encrpytion key it should go into the<totem>
> >>>> part of cluster.conf.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> looking at cluster.rng keyfile is valid for the cman block. May i just
move it
> >>> there or i should create<totem>
> >>
> >> I would just remove it. It's not doing anything, so if you move it to
> >> <totem>  you will change the encryption key used by the cluster and have
> >> to reboot all your nodes to get them communicating again.
> >>
> >
> > The cluster is not a production one, so it is OK and am looking for the
> > correct end result. My question was actually 'Is encription key valid/used
> > only from<totem>  section or in<cman>  too as described in cluster.rng file'.
> >
> > Multicast and keyfile are present in both<cman>  and<totem>  ... i guess
> > <totem>  is the preferred one for future compatibility?
> >
> 
> Confusingly, multicast must be part of <cman> and keyfile should be part 
> of <totem>.
> 
> That's just how it is, sorry ;-)
> 

Thanks. The validation schema should be updated then, as it allows keyfile in
cman too (fixed in my copy and could provide a patch).

I still can't find how do i specify per node interface. There is interface
allowed only in <totem> section while most of the nodes have (and use) bond0,
for one of them i need to specify different interface for cluster
communication. Is per node interface attribute missed from the validation
schema or is removed completely?

> Chrissie
> 
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster