[Linux-cluster] Adding a new node to rh cluster + GFS2

Arturo Gonzalez Ferrer arturogf at gmail.com
Mon Dec 14 09:09:21 UTC 2009


2009/12/14 Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie at redhat.com>

> On 14/12/09 08:49, Arturo Gonzalez Ferrer wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I'm in trouble with adding a new node to an existing cluster of three
>> nodes (so I want to have four), because it somehow doesn't let me access
>> the cluster infrastructure.
>>
>> These 3 nodes were set up as http servers, sharing a GFS2 volume
>> (physical: vg_cluster, logical: lv_cluster) where data is stored.
>>
>> I want to set up the new node to access the same GFS2 volume, with the
>> idea of exporting the data via NFS, so that a remote backup library can
>> be configured to backup nightly the data, by connecting to the new node.
>>
>> I've tried a lot of things, always getting same kind of errors.
>>
>> Running "cman_tool status" on any of the 3 nodes i get:
>>
>> Version: 6.2.0
>> Config Version: 70
>> Cluster Name: campusvirtual
>> Cluster Id: 45794
>> Cluster Member: Yes
>> Cluster Generation: 1136
>> Membership state: Cluster-Member
>> Nodes: 3
>> Expected votes: 4
>> Total votes: 3
>> Quorum: 3
>> Active subsystems: 9
>> Flags: Dirty
>> Ports Bound: 0 11 177
>> Node name: cev01
>> Node ID: 2
>> Multicast addresses: 239.192.178.149
>> Node addresses: 150.214.243.20
>>
>>
>> while running "cman_tool status" on the new node:
>>
>> Version: 6.2.0
>> Config Version: 70
>> Cluster Name: campusvirtual
>> Cluster Id: 45794
>> Cluster Member: Yes
>> Cluster Generation: 1124
>> Membership state: Cluster-Member
>> Nodes: 1
>>
>
> This is the key. The new node can't see the network traffic of the other
> three. The most likely explanation for this is iptables blocking the
> traffic.
>
> But check other network connections and settings too - It's almost
> certainly a network configuration problem. The multicast and node addresses
> look fine to me.
>

The iptables is deactivated in the new node:

[root at cevstream ~]# iptables -L
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination

Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination

Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target     prot opt source               destination

as well as the selinux, is deactivated also.

Any other idea? I don't see the flag "dirty" in the new node. It has no
service associated, i don't know if this can means anything...

Cheers,
Arturo.


>
> Chrissie
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20091214/ddff9c3f/attachment.htm>


More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list