[Linux-cluster] EMC vs HP EVA

ESGLinux esggrupos at gmail.com
Wed Jul 15 09:07:12 UTC 2009


Hi JuanRa,
for the moment I´m planning to use 2 nodes in the cluster.

I don´t want to use fiber to avoid buying a fiber switch. I´m going to use
iSCSI over ethernet with TOE support.

I´ll take a look at the SAS DAS that you told me,

Thanks for your answer

ESG

2009/7/15 Juan Ramon Martin Blanco <robejrm at gmail.com>

>
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:00 AM, ESGLinux <esggrupos at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>> Finally, I´m decided to by a shared storage to use it for clustering.
>>
>> I have seen in the web that this two solutions are well considered, so my
>> question is for all of you that have experience with them.
>>
>> Which in your opinion is best? any web that makes an imparcial comparation
>> between them?
>>
>> The final solution is for a medium size company, so the price is also a
>> factor.
>>
> How many machines are you planning to form the cluster? If you are planning
> to use 3 machines I recommend you some SAS DAS from IBM or SUN, are much
> cheaper than EVA or  EMC. Even any of the fiber equivalents of them with a
> fiber switch can be cheaper than the lasts (in case you are planning to
> connect more than 3 machines to the cluster).
>
> Regards,
> Juanra
>
>>
>> Thanks for your help,
>>
>> ESG
>>
>> --
>> Linux-cluster mailing list
>> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>>
>
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20090715/e531f4a5/attachment.htm>


More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list