[Linux-cluster] help configuring HP ILO

Ian Hayes cthulhucalling at gmail.com
Tue May 5 17:12:31 UTC 2009


On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:54 PM, ESGLinux <esggrupos at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Thanks for your answer...
>
> 2009/5/5 Ian Hayes <cthulhucalling at gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> All cluster management communication in this cluster is via eth1. I
>> specified host1-management and host2-management as the hostnames in the
>> cluster config to partition off cluster traffic from the interfaces that are
>> actually doing the VIP work. The nodes provide a virtual IP on eth0, and a
>> script service, with the daemon bound to the VIP. For the iLOs and eth1, you
>> could either plug them into a switch on their own non-trunked VLAN, or you
>> can connect eth1 of host1 to the iLO of host 2, and eth1 of host2 to the iLO
>> of host1. Both eth1 and iLOs don't need a gateway since they're on the same
>> subnet.
>>
>
> If I have understand, if I use a dedicated switch, I must to connect IP2,
> IP3, IP5 and IP6 to the same switche and IP1 and IP4 to the service switch,
> isn´t it?
>

If you're using a dedicated switch for cluster management, yes. Assuming
that IP1 and 4 are your public facing interfaces that will be holding the
service. You can use 2 and 5 for cluster management and fencing via IP3 and
6.

Or you can use crossover cables IP2 to IP6, and IP5 to IP3, but you will
have to run your cluster management over eth0, on the same interface that
you have your services bound to. Your choice.

But you can't reach the iLO interfaces using the other iLOs. Think of them
as "recieve only". It's up to one of the hosts to establish a connection to
them and issue commands.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20090505/a04f4c2e/attachment.htm>


More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list