[Linux-cluster] Two-Node Cluster Problem
Tiago Cruz
tiagocruz at forumgdh.net
Tue May 26 16:24:41 UTC 2009
Did you have:
<cman two_node="1" expected_votes="1"/>
?
--
Tiago Cruz <tiagocruz at forumgdh.net>
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 16:00 +0200, Marco Nietz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have a Problem running a Two-Node Cluster (without qudisk) on RHEL 5.3
> with all the latest Patches installed. For testing i use a very simple
> setup with only one ip-address as the service.
>
> Both nodes have two network-interfaces, both are configured in cluster.conf
>
> <clusternodes>
> <clusternode name="10.102.10.51" nodeid="1" votes="1">
> <altname name="10.209.170.51"/>
> <fence>
> <method name="1">
> <device name="ipsdb01.drac"/>
> </method>
> </fence>
> </clusternode>
> <clusternode name="10.102.10.28" nodeid="2" votes="1">
> <altname name="10.209.170.28"/>
> <fence>
> <method name="1">
> <device name="ips08.drac"/>
> </method>
> </fence>
> </clusternode>
>
> When the service runs on node b and i take down the first interface
> (10.209.170.28) with: 'ip link set eth1 down' the service is taken over
> by node a within a few seconds. When i then disable the second interface
> on node b i would expect that node a recognize the failure and fence
> down node b but this does not happen. This only occurs in this one
> direction, the other way - node a holds the service and need to be
> fenced by node b works fine.
>
> What could cause such a behaviour ?
>
> Here are some more sniplets which could be interessting from my cluster.conf
>
> <fence_daemon clean_start="1" post_fail_delay="10" post_join_delay="30"/>
>
> <cman expected_votes="1" two_node="1">
>
> Most of the configuration was done using conga (luci,ricci)
>
>
> Regards
> Marco
>
> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list