[Linux-cluster] GFS2 interesting death with error
Steven Whitehouse
swhiteho at redhat.com
Fri Nov 6 09:52:10 UTC 2009
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 14:36 -0500, Allen Belletti wrote:
> Saw an interesting and different GFS2 death this morning that I wanted
> to pass along in case anyone has insights. We have not seen any of the
> "hanging in dlm_posix_lock" since fsck'ing early Sunday morning. In any
> case I'm pretty confident that's being triggered by the creation &
> deletion of ".lock" files within Dovecot. This was something completely
> different and it left some potentially useful debug info in the logs.
>
> Things were running fine when the machine "post2" abruptly died. The
> following was found to have been enscribed upon its stone logs:
>
> Nov 5 10:56:28 post2 kernel: original: gfs2_rindex_hold+0x32/0x153 [gfs2]
> Nov 5 10:56:28 post2 kernel: pid : 27197
> Nov 5 10:56:28 post2 kernel: lock type: 2 req lock state : 3
> Nov 5 10:56:28 post2 kernel: new: gfs2_rindex_hold+0x32/0x153 [gfs2]
> Nov 5 10:56:28 post2 kernel: pid: 27197
> Nov 5 10:56:28 post2 kernel: lock type: 2 req lock state : 3
> Nov 5 10:56:28 post2 kernel: G: s:SH n:2/2053b f:s t:SH d:EX/0 l:0
> a:0 r:4
> Nov 5 10:56:28 post2 kernel: H: s:SH f:H e:0 p:27197 [procmail]
> gfs2_rindex_hold+0x32/0x153 [gfs2]
> Nov 5 10:56:28 post2 kernel: I: n:23/132411 t:8 f:0x00000010
> Nov 5 10:56:28 post2 kernel: ----------- [cut here ] --------- [please
> bite here ] ---------
> Nov 5 10:56:32 post2 kernel: Kernel BUG at
> ...ir/build/BUILD/gfs2-kmod-1.92/_kmod_build_/glock.c:950
>
There should have been a stack trace following this message which is
critical to tracking down the bug. What kernel version is this?
Did you run gfs2_grow at any time?
Steve.
More information about the Linux-cluster
mailing list