[Linux-cluster] High availability mail server

[Steven Whitehouse]

Hi,

On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 10:36 +0100, Jakov Sosic wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:05:23 +0000
> Gordan Bobic <gordan at bobich.net> wrote:
> 
> > This may well be fine when you are dealing with large-ish files and
> > your workload is arranged in such a way that accesses to particular
> > data subtrees is typically executed on only one node at a time
> 
> So If I organize my cluster nodes that every one of them accesses one
> specific subtree directory of GFS/GFS2/OCFS2 partition, I would't get
> so slow performance like if the access patterns were all mixed up?
> 
> 
Yes, thats the correct solution to the caching issue,

Steve.