[Linux-cluster] is it possible an active-active NFS server?

[ESGLinux]

2010/6/28 Gordan Bobic <gordan at bobich.net>

> On 06/28/2010 11:11 AM, ESGLinux wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I´m going to mount an active-active file server and my first idea is to
>> mount a NFS service with luci but now I have the doubt if is it
>>  possible. with luci i have allways mounted Active-Passive services. So,
>> my question is that.
>>
>> Any other aproach to get an Active-Active file Server?
>>
>
>
> Not with NFS, since NFS has no feature to have multiple servers/share. But
> there is no reason you can't connect half of the clients to the other
> server.
>

I haven't realized about it, it could be a solution.

one thing, I have been investigating about it, and  I have thought it could
be possible using Linux Virtual Server (administered with piranha), what do
you think about it?




>
> If you need client-side multi-homing, GlusterFS can do that.
>
>
in this project I only can use red hat certified solutions. I suposse
GlusterFS isn't,

Thanks for your answer



> Gordan
>
>
ESG


> --
> Linux-cluster mailing list
> Linux-cluster at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20100628/71af4a25/attachment.htm>