[Linux-cluster] which is better gfs2 and ocfs2?

rhurst at bidmc.harvard.edu rhurst at bidmc.harvard.edu
Wed Mar 9 15:23:31 UTC 2011

Depends on the application's use of the filesystem and your processing usage patterns.  You should evaluate both.

We're using 8gbit FC and 1gb private networking between two pairs (test & production) of 4-node clusters on IBM BladeCenter.  We used RHEL 4 GFS from 2007 - 2010 without issue.  Upgraded to RHEL 5u5, then most of the GFS filesystems to GFS2 without issues (yet).

We'd like to see a working cluster configuration using GFS2 on KVM guests.
From: linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of yue
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 9:14 AM
To: linux-cluster
Subject: [Linux-cluster] which is better gfs2 and ocfs2?

which is better gfs2 and ocfs2?
i want to share fc-san, do you know which is better?


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110309/3b40a9ea/attachment.htm>

More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list