[Linux-cluster] which is better gfs2 and ocfs2?

[rhurst at bidmc.harvard.edu]

Depends on the application's use of the filesystem and your processing usage patterns.  You should evaluate both.

We're using 8gbit FC and 1gb private networking between two pairs (test & production) of 4-node clusters on IBM BladeCenter.  We used RHEL 4 GFS from 2007 - 2010 without issue.  Upgraded to RHEL 5u5, then most of the GFS filesystems to GFS2 without issues (yet).

We'd like to see a working cluster configuration using GFS2 on KVM guests.
________________________________
From: linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of yue
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 9:14 AM
To: linux-cluster
Subject: [Linux-cluster] which is better gfs2 and ocfs2?

which is better gfs2 and ocfs2?
i want to share fc-san, do you know which is better?
stablility,performmance?


thanks


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110309/3b40a9ea/attachment.htm>