[Linux-cluster] which is better gfs2 and ocfs2?

Wed Mar 9 15:48:10 UTC 2011

On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:23:31 -0500, rhurst at bidmc.harvard.edu wrote:

> We'd like to see a working cluster configuration using GFS2 on KVM
guests.

Got one of those although it's a very small-scale setup using
Fedora 14. 

Bare metal uses gfs2 for hosting KVM image files. vm's
managed by RH cluster3 stack. 

VMs use gfs2 for sharing Maildir spool
for a small postfix/dovecot setup with webmail frontend. All on shared
iSCSI based storage. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20110309/fd272d05/attachment.htm>