[Linux-cluster] q about post_fail_delay
linux at alteeve.com
Mon May 16 22:52:44 UTC 2011
On 05/16/2011 06:03 PM, Alvaro Jose Fernandez wrote:
> Do using a post_fail_delay > 0, when triggered, blocks running resources
> on the node, if one is not using GFS? . For example, if one only uses a
> couple of fs resources locally mounted in HA configuration, not shared
> filesystems at all.
I believe that all IO blocks because the cluster is not able to ensure
that messages arrived to all nodes in the same order, as the
silent/failed node stopped responding. This is a trait called "virtual
E-Mail: digimer at alteeve.com
Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org
"I feel confined, only free to expand myself within boundaries."
More information about the Linux-cluster