[Linux-cluster] Question about gfs2 and Option 4 of HA stack

Moullé Alain alain.moulle at bull.net
Wed Jan 22 07:41:20 UTC 2014


OK but except if I miss something in the responses ... my question was 
more about managing GFS2 stack and FS as Pacemaker resources , no 
problem at all ?

Thanks again

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:28:10PM +0000, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 13:16 +0100, Moullé Alain wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> As far as I know the final stack option 4 (with Pacemaker and quorum API
>>> of corosync instead of cman) will be the stack delivered on RHEL7,
>>> always right ?
>>> So my question is about GFS2 : will it be working together with this
>>> last stack ? (knowing that GFS2 was "a little" tied with cman)
>>> Thanks
>>> Alain
>> There is nothing cman specific about GFS2. It can work with pcs quite
>> happily, and that is how current upstream/Fedora works these days,
> Upstream also happily works more independently, as shown here:
> http://people.redhat.com/teigland/cluster4-gfs2-dlm.txt
> Dave

More information about the Linux-cluster mailing list