[Linux-cluster] Clusterbehaviour if one node is not reachable & fenceable any longer?

[Digimer]

99% of the time, I agree totally. Logs and configs are super helpful. In 
this case though, I am pretty sure I know exactly what's happening. :)

digimer

On 29/01/14 11:00 AM, emmanuel segura wrote:
> as Digimer told, maybe a fencing had failed, but just say i got a
> cluster with a service that doesn't switch to other nodes after a
> fencing happen, without info and cluster log and without conf, is not good
>
>
> 2014-01-29 Nicolas Kukolja <nicolas.kukolja at gmail.com
> <mailto:nicolas.kukolja at gmail.com>>
>
>     emmanuel segura <emi2fast <at> gmail.com <http://gmail.com>> writes:
>
>      >
>      >
>      > i think is really hard help you with this kind of infomartion
>
>
>     What information do think you will need to be able to understand my
>     problem/help?
>     I'll try to provide whatever may be needed...
>
>     Nicolas
>
>
>     --
>     Linux-cluster mailing list
>     Linux-cluster at redhat.com <mailto:Linux-cluster at redhat.com>
>     https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cluster
>
>
>
>
> --
> esta es mi vida e me la vivo hasta que dios quiera
>
>


-- 
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without 
access to education?