[Linux-cluster] Fencing problem w/ 2-node VM when a VM host dies
kelvin.edmison at alcatel-lucent.com
Fri Dec 4 01:39:34 UTC 2015
On 12/03/2015 06:14 PM, Digimer wrote:
> On 03/12/15 02:19 PM, Kelvin Edmison wrote:
>> I am hoping that someone can help me understand the problems I'm having
>> with linux clustering for VMs.
>> I am clustering 2 VMs on two separate VM hosts, trying to ensure that a
>> service is always available. The hosts and guests are both RHEL 6.7.
>> The goal is to have only one of the two VMs running at a time.
>> The configuration works when we test/simulate VM deaths and graceful VM
>> host shutdowns, and administrative switchovers (i.e. clusvcadm -r ).
>> However, when we simulate the sudden isolation of host A (e.g. ifdown
>> eth0), two things happen
>> 1) the VM on host B does not start, and repeated fence_xvm errors appear
>> in the logs on host B
>> 2) when the 'failed' node is returned to service, the cman service on
>> host B dies.
> If the node's host is dead, then there is no way for the survivor to
> determine the state of the lost VM node. The cluster is not allowed to
> take "no answer" as confirmation of fence success.
> If your hosts have IPMI, then you could add fence_ipmilan as a backup
> method where, if fence_xvm fails, it moves on and reboots the host itself.
Thank you for the suggestion. The hosts do have ipmi. I'll explore it
but I'm a little concerned about what it means for the other
non-clustered VM workloads that exist on these two servers.
Do you have any thoughts as to why host B's cman process is dying when
'host A' returns?
More information about the Linux-cluster