[Linux-cluster] Alternative to resource monitor polling?

[Vallevand, Mark K]

Is this the correct forum for questions like this?

Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
pacemaker 1.1.10
cman 3.1.7
corosync 1.4.6

One more question:
If my cluster has no resources, it seems like it takes 20s for a stopped node to be detected.  Is the value really 20s and is it a parameter that can be adjusted?

Thanks.

Regards.
Mark K Vallevand   Mark.Vallevand at Unisys.com<mailto:Mark.Vallevand at Unisys.com>
Never try and teach a pig to sing: it's a waste of time, and it annoys the pig.
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
From: linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:linux-cluster-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of Vallevand, Mark K
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 12:19 PM
To: linux clustering
Subject: [Linux-cluster] Alternative to resource monitor polling?

Is there an alternative to resource monitor polling to detect a resource failure?
If, for example, a resource failure is detected by our own software, could it signal clustering that a resource has failed?

Regards.
Mark K Vallevand   Mark.Vallevand at Unisys.com<mailto:Mark.Vallevand at Unisys.com>
Never try and teach a pig to sing: it's a waste of time, and it annoys the pig.
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cluster/attachments/20151015/b7f3e5d6/attachment.htm>