[linux-lvm] System locks solid under LVM
Tony Rogers
tony at racsys.demon.co.uk
Sat Apr 17 15:40:46 UTC 1999
On Sat, 17 Apr 1999, Heinz Mauelshagen wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
>
> Hello Tony.
>
> I'll ask some questions about issues i don't quite understand and i'll try
> to give you some hints/statements which might be helpfull to find
> the problem(s).
>
>
Hello,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
My Work machine is using Redhat 5.1 with kernel 2.0.34.
I have not applied the patches to either machine. I will try this on
my home machine ASAP. It didn't look important, as I didn't get the
invalid protocol message.
My test LV is as reported by lvdisplay. There are more than 1 PVs AND
more than 1 disk:
--- Logical volume ---
LV Name /dev/vg1/lv2
VG Name vg1
LV Write Access read/write
LV Status available
LV # 2
# open 0
LV Size 1.46 GB
Current LE 375
Allocated LE 375
Allocation next free
Read ahead sectors 120
Block device 58:0
--- Distribution of logical volume on 4 physical volumes ---
PV Name PE on PV reads writes
/dev/sdb9 125 0 0
/dev/sdc9 66 0 0
/dev/sdb10 172 0 0
/dev/sdc10 12 0 0
<snip of detailed report>
======== E N D O F L V D I S P L A Y ==========================
I think the memory timing is OK, it's not been a problem before, and
as I mentioned it seems to be OK except under LVM.
As far as interrupts are concerned, there is always that possibility!
But again, it's OK except under LVM, and I have been careful to make
sure it is stable without the Volume Manager.
I used to want to stripe the data under one controller to try to get
some extra performance, but I would rather have the flexibility of
resizeable partitions, so I might try repartitioning my hard disk, to
enable me to use larger partitions, if that would make it more
reliable.
What do you think about this?
Many thanks, once again.
Tony Rogers
===========
More information about the linux-lvm
mailing list