[linux-lvm] Actual status of LVM in stock kernel

Ryan Murray rmurray at cyberhqz.com
Mon Nov 15 21:38:51 UTC 1999

On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 09:59:12PM +0100, Heinz Mauelshagen wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 09:39:59AM -0600, Daniel Whicker wrote:
> > > Heinz, have you heard from anyone at RedHat?  With their recent push 
> > > towards servers as well as their deal with Oracle, LVM seems like it would 
> > > be a perfect fit, especially if you're looking at breaking into Data Centers.
> > IFAIRC sct at redhat.com signed the (in)famous LVM petition
> > 
> YEP.

I would suggest posting the patch to linux-kernel, cc: it to linus, and
ask whether it is too late for 2.4, or if there is something else that
needs to be addressed before it is ready.  I haven't seen it discussed
on lkml, which may well be why linus isn't replying.

Ryan Murray (rmurray at cyberhqz.com, rmurray at glenayre.com)
Software Designer, Glenayre Technologies Inc.
The opinions expressed here are my own.

More information about the linux-lvm mailing list