[linux-lvm] Re: LVM 2.2 snapshot bug

Stephen C. Tweedie sct at redhat.com
Wed Nov 8 11:11:29 UTC 2000


On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 01:36:06PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Andreas writes:
> It would probably be a lot better to simply change ext3 to handle the
> "proper snapshot" stuff that is in ReiserFS, so that at the time of the
> snapshot, the journal is flushed and the RECOVER flag is removed from
> the superblock (and returned afterwards).

Right --- that's easy to do, but it doesn't mean that it's OK to lie
about the ro_bits!


More information about the linux-lvm mailing list