[linux-lvm] PBs with LVM over software RAID
Andreas Dilger
adilger at turbolabs.com
Fri Aug 31 22:56:56 UTC 2001
On Sep 01, 2001 00:24 +0200, svetljo wrote:
> it works with IMB's JFS
> when i try mkfs -t reiserfs -f /dev/myData/SRC it segfaults :
>
> [root at svetljo mnt]# mkfs -t reiserfs -f /dev/myData/SRC
> mkreiserfs, 2001 - reiserfsprogs 3.x.0j
> ===================================================================
> LEAF NODE (8211) contains level=1, nr_items=2, free_space=3932 rdkey
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> |###|type|ilen|f/sp| loc|fmt|fsck|
> key |
> | | | |e/cn| |
> |need| |
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Segmentation fault
>
> isn't that a bit strange that reiserfs and xfs doesn't handle it, but
> jfs does
It could just be lucky that JFS works, depending on access patterns.
> and the one with ext2 :
>
> [root at svetljo mnt]# mkfs -t ext2 /dev/myData/SRC
> mke2fs 1.22, 22-Jun-2001 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
> Filesystem label=
> OS type: Linux
> Block size=4096 (log=2)
> Fragment size=4096 (log=2)
> 786432 inodes, 1572864 blocks
> 78643 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user
> First data block=0
> 48 block groups
> 32768 blocks per group, 32768 fragments per group
> 16384 inodes per group
> Superblock backups stored on blocks:
> 32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736
>
> Writing inode tables: Segmentation fault
Then it is definitely not anything to do with the filesystem itself
(although it may be with the XFS patch). Try a kernel without the
XFS patch and see if this makes a difference. Maybe it is a bad
interaction between XFS, RAID, LVM?
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
\ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ -- Dogbert
More information about the linux-lvm
mailing list