[linux-lvm] Newbie question
Heinz J. Mauelshagen
Mauelshagen at sistina.com
Mon Jul 16 11:34:17 UTC 2001
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 08:01:13PM +0200, Luca Berra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 01:12:00PM +0200, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote:
> > > Another question is the boot stuff, what is better? compile LVM as a module
> > > and use inird or compile the kernel with built-in LVM support?
> >
> > It doesn't make a difference if you go for the module or the build in driver,
> > you need to have an initrd today anyway to activate your VGs at boot time.
> >
> > We are working on boot time recognition of VGs in the driver which will vanish
> > the initrd. That will be in a post 1.0 version of the Linux LVM.
>
> is this still worthwile since i read Linus in thinking of a new way
> to handle initrd (appending a tar file to a kernel image and populating
> a ramfs with it) and moving many _init code that now bloats kernel
> to userspace.
Yes, we do move the functions to read metadata into the LVM kernel code
because we need them in the cluster case anyway.
>
> Regards,
> L.
>
> --
> Luca Berra -- bluca at comedia.it
> Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
> /"\
> \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
> X AGAINST HTML MAIL
> / \
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm at sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://www.sistina.com/lvm/Pages/howto.html
--
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf
Germany
Mauelshagen at Sistina.com +49 2626 141200
FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
More information about the linux-lvm
mailing list