[linux-lvm] Problems with 0.9.1b7 and 2.2.20-2
rasmus at jaquet.dk
Tue Jun 5 13:46:57 UTC 2001
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 12:34:17PM +0200, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote:
> This sounds like a well known ext2 problem.
> Did you run fsck successfully? And if so, didn't it work again?
Uhm. Known problem? Could you elaborate a bit? I have not seen it
before and would like to know if it is something I will encounter
regularily using ext2 and LVM.
I have run e2fsck a number of times now, and while I do not get
the kernel log message after the reboot (se below) fsck complain
and fix stuff every time in lost+found which contain a lot of
junk I cannot delete manually either.
> > I can do a 'dd if=/dev/<diskX> of=/dev/null' for the disks that are
> > part of the volume group without problems but if I do it for /dev/vg1/
> > lvol4, I get the error above (without the EXT2-part).
> Did you *really* run "dd if=/dev/vg1/lvol4 of=/dev/null" and got that error
> in the log? Never have seen that before.
I will try to reproduce. But trying to get as much as the (used)
filesystem with off the disk with tar resulted in a kernel panic
(this was just after my last mail):
panic: brw_page: page not locked for IO
This was put after a couple of lines of
Jun 5 10:04:35 firewall kernel: attempt to access beyond end of device
Jun 5 10:04:35 firewall kernel: 08:01: rw=0, want=530420, limit=410608
Jun 5 10:04:35 firewall kernel: dev 3a:03 blksize=1024 blocknr=622592 sector=1060832 size=4096 count=1
on the console.
Rasmus(rasmus at jaquet.dk)
"I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers. We are
the president." -Hillary Clinton commenting on the release of subpoenaed
More information about the linux-lvm