[linux-lvm] LVM and *bad* performance (no striping)
Andreas Dilger
adilger at turbolinux.com
Tue May 15 17:08:22 UTC 2001
Urs writes:
> Sorry, I hadn't time to test your patch earlier. I wanted to try it
> yesterday but lvm-0.9.1-beta7 with your patch applied doesn't compile.
Sorry, I must have missed some parts of the patch for the user-space
tools. Even so, I don't think the patch will help.
> I also did some tests with another hard disk drive. My previous tests
> were with a IBM DCAS-34330W SCSI-U2W. I now did some tests with a NEC
> DSE2100S SCSI2 drive. Again, LVM is much slower with the standard
> 512 byte block size:
One other person had a similar problem. It was because they were
using PIO mode instead of DMA mode on their (IDE) drive. However,
I see you are using a SCSI disk, so I don't know what to suggest...
What SCSI controller are you using?
> And am I really the only one who sees this? I would really be
> interested to hear from some more people about performance for their
> LVM.
I have never seen more than a few percent difference between LVM and
non-LVM performance.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
\ would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ -- Dogbert
More information about the linux-lvm
mailing list