[linux-lvm] lvm 1.0 and kernel 2.2.19.Is rawio patch necessary ??
Jesus Manuel NAVARRO LOPEZ
jesus_navarro at promofinarsa.es
Thu Oct 4 19:00:17 UTC 2001
Hi again christian:
christian e wrote:
>
> christian e wrote:
>
> > I think I'll try the 2.2.18 patch as well..Will let you all know if it
> > turned out ok or not..
>
> Just tried the following:
>
> removed old kernel source tree,untarred a fresh 2.2.19 source.Did a
> ./configure in the lvm source dir.Then a make in the PATCHES DIR.Then
> applied the rawio patch for 2.2.18 and then the lvm-1.0 patch for my
> kernel 2.2.19.Patched clean without problems.
>
> Then compiled the kernel again.Then the modules..mind you I compiled lvm
> into the kernel not as module..No problems.
>
> Bootup withput problems (only forgetting to patch with aacraid driver
> but htat's another story :-)
>
> compiled lvm and installed..Works ok..
>
I had a fast day with some other snmp stuff so I didn't have time for
the LVM stuff. Only concern i I won't use root as LVM and it is stayed
that LVM should be compiled as a module preferably (I think coz the
developers don't considered that code so stable). Anyway, it seems that
we're near of a goal (at least, what's the problem with the de struct
member is allocated and pointed out to some 2.3.x kernel addition, so I
think it can be repaired for rc5 next week). Let's see...
In any case, thanks for your aid folks.
--
SALUD,
Jesús
***
jesus_navarro at promofinarsa.es
***
More information about the linux-lvm
mailing list