[linux-lvm] lvm and 'poor mans raid' on heterogenous hard drives!

Rupa Schomaker rupa-list at rupa.com
Thu Feb 21 10:15:02 UTC 2002


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

"William Blunn" <bill at tao-group.com> writes:

> Swap devices only contain volatile data anyway.

> I wouldn't mind losing the contents of my swap device. The machine will
> probably crash. It's the same as if the machine went down through a
> power outage. Not a big problem. Assuming only the swap device failed, I
> could just re-boot and run with a bit less swap space.

<nod>  But we try to minimize the posibility of failure.  Thats why
many of us have a UPS hooked up.  If there is a power failure we can
shutdown the system cleanly on our own terms and not the power
companies. 

> If the drive fails, I lose the contents of any filesystems on the same
> drive. Much more significant. The fact that the machine went down
> because the swap device failed pales into insignificance, because now
> all the data has disappeared. No-one can do any work until we have
> replaces disk(s), sorted out the filesystems, restored from backups etc.

Unless it is mirrored somehow...

- -- 
- -rupa

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQEVAwUBPHUdBnHDM4ucEopdAQGzPAf+InTVnZvUXgsMKMFxZqf8WUiFlqBwInY3
96MKgZtjtB2EvnChkVe9uUMksUGeMjarrAO9e1TMpnGzU2wjEcZySID8i+vErEYB
ypG7vHT0VHLzZi+NsRlT1X7HKwLizU74TkDGE8/5H5HQN04HId9OgKeRDbi6XyLV
Ms5TCfMET3q3lbT3LaYnOGjXZkOfrFsRt3z36CWaDfhOxyauZTYi3ThaCk2vs6jm
PPU6PELmboJTIp7vmhv9VKSqwMMBYpgCDp20mmVZEaoRpz6ymWc0SCyyWTCrujQh
RaXtolG9u8Aqj0aQvPgtKjpJKbCMspZM8Wtr55KGKmnqF+AVHkl3Tg==
=6+ot
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the linux-lvm mailing list