[linux-lvm] LVM2 strangeness.
Heinz J . Mauelshagen
mauelshagen at sistina.com
Mon Jun 2 04:42:02 UTC 2003
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 04:35:28PM -0700, Max Kalika wrote:
> Quick followup...
>
> I blew away the snapshots and tried again. The performance was much better
> (not surprisingly), but I still have lots of "busy buffer" messages in the
> kernel log. Would anyone know what this is all about, and whether or not I
> should worry about it?
No, they're are caused by our tools syncing LVM metadata and will
disapapear in the next LVM2 release (as Joe mentioned).
> I'm considering putting LVM2 on a production mail
> server, primarily for the simple resize capabilities, but also to use
> snapshots during the rsync process (so as not to get many "file doesn't
> exist" errors).
Go for it :)
Regards,
Heinz -- The LVM Guy --
>
> Quoting Max Kalika <max+lists.lvm-dev at lsit.ucsb.edu>:
>
> > Hello LVM devs and others,
> >
> > I've been trying to use LVM2 on a backup server for the past few days and
> > I'm seeing some very strange things.
> >
> > My configuration:
> > Dell PowerEdge 1300 (800Mhz)
> > 512 MB RAM (2GB swap)
> > 4 120GB IDE (8mb cache) disks in a RAID-5 configuration (on a 3ware
> > card) Custom built vanilla kernel (2.4.20) with DM patches (0.96.08)
> > applied LVM2 utilities version 1.95.15
> >
> > I have a 300GB VG with a 150GB LV on it. I also have a 50GB snapshot and
> > a 10GB snapshot. I first rsync all remote server data (8 other machines)
> > to this "holding area" -- where I also hope to have 7 days of snapshot
> > information available on disk. From here, the latest "current" data gets
> > pushed to tape.
> >
> > Right now during an rsync of a huge mailstore (lots of small files) from
> > the mail server, the performance on the backup server degrades severly (up
> > to 12 1min load ave. and higher) and I'm seeing lots of the following in
> > the kernel log:
> >
> > May 29 14:14:15 butters invalidate: busy buffer
> > May 29 14:14:15 butters invalidate: busy buffer
> > May 29 14:14:15 butters invalidate: busy buffer
> > May 29 14:14:15 butters invalidate: busy buffer
> > ... on and on and on ...
> >
> > I'm guessing that most of the cpu is busy copying stuff from the original
> > LV to the snapshots. Is this a valid assumption? What can one do to help
> > the situation? Or do I have a different misconfiguration? Any light you
> > can shed on this is greatly appreciated. TIA.
> >
> > --
> > ---max kalika
> > --max at lsit.ucsb.edu
> > -lsit systems administrator
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-lvm mailing list
> > linux-lvm at sistina.com
> > http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
>
>
>
> ---max kalika
> --max at lsit.ucsb.edu
> -lsit systems administrator
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm at sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
*** Software bugs are stupid.
Nevertheless it needs not so stupid people to solve them ***
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Heinz Mauelshagen Sistina Software Inc.
Senior Consultant/Developer Am Sonnenhang 11
56242 Marienrachdorf
Germany
Mauelshagen at Sistina.com +49 2626 141200
FAX 924446
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
More information about the linux-lvm
mailing list