[linux-lvm] lvm2 and xfs (repost)

Jason H. Smith jason at oes.co.th
Mon Jun 9 09:32:08 UTC 2003

On Friday 06 June 2003 04:25 pm, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> why not go for a recent -ac kernel and skip patching :)
> ( in -ac are included both xfs and dm )
> and someone posted a dm-patch against xfs kernel on the list

I played with 2.4.20 + xfs + vfs lock + lvm2, plus some patches I made to 
output snapshot usage in 512-byte increments.  While the patches don't 
apply, per se, it's mostly because patch isn't smart enough to notice the 
code moving around.  I think there were like 1 or 2 .reg files, with 
maybe two trivial fixes each.  So merging manually isn't bad, e.g. if you 
don't want any of the other -ac changes.

GPG: 03EE 9EB8 E500 874A F509  7B95 9B9A 84A1 26E9 4F79
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm/attachments/20030609/c63530a4/attachment.sig>

More information about the linux-lvm mailing list