[linux-lvm] LVM 1.0.7
herbert at 13thfloor.at
Mon Jun 16 21:13:01 UTC 2003
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 04:43:58PM -0700, Petro wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 05:37:42AM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 06:25:50PM -0700, Petro wrote:
> > > When building the 2.4.21 kernel does one still need to apply the patches
> > > generated by LVM/1.0.7/PATCHES/Makefile?
> > > I'm having issues with the kernel building and a lot of errors seem to
> > > be coming from the (patched) LVM stuff.
> > you could try this patch ...
> > http://www.13thfloor.at/VServer/patches-2.4.21-c17/07_lvm-1.0.7-2.4.21pre5.patch.bz2
> > which actually works for me ...
> The make file halts with a
> You haven't applied the rawio patch, please see the README
> make: *** [check_rawio] Error 1
let me get this straight,
you download a vanilla 2.4.21 kernel, unpack it, apply
the patch mentioned above, configure it accordingly and
start a kernel compile, which then breaks with the message
I do not believe this, I tried it myself, and it compiled
I guess I am misreading your email?
> Which is really odd since the README in the PATCHES directory
> doesn't mention a rawio patch for the 2.4 series.
> The 2.4.20-VFS-lock.patch fails against the "raw" (i.e. d/l'd from
> kernel.org kernel.
raw = vanilla here?
> The above patch applies and builds "properly" (i.e. compiles w/out
> failure) against a clean linus kernel.
the VFS-lock patch or the lvm patch?
> "On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray,
> Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right
> answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion
> of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm at sistina.com
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
More information about the linux-lvm