[linux-lvm] LVM2 on 2.4.22. (Fedora core 1 with nptl)
bluca at comedia.it
Fri Nov 21 13:00:01 UTC 2003
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 11:21:20PM +0000, tugg wrote:
>Trying to install LVM2 on 2.4.22. (Fedora core 1 with nptl)
>For device mapper: did configure followed by make install. There is no patch
>for 2.4.22 so I assumed that the kernel was already patched (mistake?). LVM and
>device mapper are already loadable modules, so no need to recompile kernel
>(correct?). Added script to /etc/modules.conf and reboot. DMESG shows LVM
>version 1.0.5+(22/07/2002) module loaded.
>pvscan -h gives me the following:
>Logical Volume Manager 1.0.3
>Heinz Mauelshagen, Sistina Software 19/02/2002 (IOP 10)
>Why is it telling me 1.0.3 when DMESG says 1.0.5+?
1.0.5+ is the kernel driver version
1.0.3 is the version of the pvscan proram
>After trying all of the above, found patches for 2.4.22 via mailing list
>archives (2.4.22-dm-1.tar.bz2) and upacked to get directory 2.4.22-dm-1
>containing patch files 00001 through 00016 and INDEX. Used cat to create one
>large patch file (file patches-2.4.22.patch attached) with all the patches
>(mistake?) and did patch --dry-run -p1
i would try appliyng them one by one.
>with this file (only dry run, so nothing applied yet). This indicates some
>patches will apply, some are already applied, and quite a few will fail (see
>attached patches-2.4.22.log file). Is this because I installed device mapper
>before the patches, or do these patches just not fit my system?
2.4.22-dm-1.tar.bz2appliest to vanilla 2.4.22 kernel
redhat/fedora kernel has been modified from vanilla
either you are able to massage those patches or you use vanilla or you
bug fedora developers to patch their kernel for dm.
>Also, HOWTO says I need 1.0.6 or later (I assume this is the driver version,
>not the library version?) - do I need another kernel patch to do that, is it
>included in the patches I am trying to apply, or will that install as part of
1.0.6 is for lvm 1, redhat lvm1 is heavily modified as well
if you devide for a vanilla kernel and want both lvm1 and lvm2 i;d
suggest using recent lvm tolls as well.
If you have not the skill to o all this, stay with fedora and wait for
them to upgrade
>cvs dm 1.0
>--- diff/Documentation/Configure.help 2003-08-26 13:49:59.000000000 +0100
>+++ source/Documentation/Configure.help 2003-08-26 13:59:04.000000000 +0100
NEVER EVER ATTACH A 350K FILE AGAIN!
Luca Berra -- bluca at comedia.it
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
More information about the linux-lvm