[linux-lvm] Re: dm, dm_table, request_queue
thornber at redhat.com
Tue Feb 24 04:02:06 UTC 2004
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 01:21:16AM +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> All in all, I think that the first approach is the simplest and
> therefor the best.
> So how does this look:
Better wrt keeping mapped_device out of dm-table.c. But it still has
the problem that it treats congestion in any subdevices equally (which
may be a good approximation to start with).
I'll stick this in my pending queue, and look at it later in the week.
I think you're quite close, given that Jens doesn't want the
backing_dev pointer in the queue.
More information about the linux-lvm