[linux-lvm] lvm2 tools can't locate pvs on entire disks
Miles Crawford
mcrawfor at u.washington.edu
Tue May 10 15:13:08 UTC 2005
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Klaus Strebel wrote:
> Miles Crawford schrieb:
>>
>> I'm running into trouble here, getting the lvm scanning tools to notice PVs
>> I have created on entire disks, like this:
>>
>> pvcreate /dev/hdd
>>
>> Some output:
>>
>> root at end root # lvm version
>> LVM version: 2.01.04 (2005-02-09)
>> Library version: 1.01.00-ioctl (2005-01-17)
>> Driver version: 4.1.0
>> root at end root # uname -a
>> Linux end.snip.net 2.6.8 #6 Sat Oct 9 20:59:02 PDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
>> root at end root # lvmdiskscan
>> /dev/hda1 [ 111.79 GB]
>> /dev/hdb1 [ 18.63 GB]
>> /dev/hdd1 [ 186.31 GB]
>> /dev/hdb2 [ 127.59 GB]
>> /dev/hdb3 [ 2.83 GB]
>> 0 disks
>> 5 partitions
>> 0 LVM physical volume whole disks
>> 0 LVM physical volumes
>> root at end root # pvscan
>> No matching physical volumes found
>>
>> Well that's odd, I know they're there. Lets try this:
>>
>> root at end root # losetup /dev/loop0 /dev/hda
>> root at end root # losetup /dev/loop1 /dev/hdd
>> root at end root # pvscan
>> PV /dev/loop0 VG media_vg lvm2 [111.79 GB / 0 free]
>> PV /dev/loop1 VG media_vg lvm2 [186.31 GB / 0 free]
>> Total: 2 [298.10 GB] / in use: 2 [298.10 GB] / in no VG: 0 [0 ]
> Hi Miles,
>
> the disks hda and hdb obviously are partitioned (they are shown as /dev/hda1
> and /dev/hdb1), so don't trying to detroy these partitions, he doesn't know
> what the contents of, is good behaviour of lvm, isn't it ;-).
>
> Ciao
> Klaus
So, you're saying that although the lvm PVs are _not_ on partitions,
the disklabel still describes some partition on the disk, so lvm is
ignoring the disk as a whole as a possible PV?
-miles
More information about the linux-lvm
mailing list