[linux-lvm] advice for curing terrible snapshot performance?
Stuart D. Gathman
stuart at bmsi.com
Mon Nov 15 22:57:18 UTC 2010
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Stephane Chazelas wrote:
> ddsnap (zumastor) worked great but is no longer maintained.
> - LVM snapshots: poor performace or very few snapshots
> - ddsnap: got to stick with an old kernel
zumastor doesn't depend on kernel versions - it uses device-mapper just
like regular snapshots. (Or does it have a special device-mapper
> - btrfs, not really production ready yet. Probably your best bet
This is good too, but at a different level. We still need LV snapshot.
> - fuse solutions, with all the fuse related issues.
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart at bmsi.com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
More information about the linux-lvm