[linux-lvm] LVM over RAID, or plain disks? A:"Yes" = best of both worlds?
Keld Jørn Simonsen
keld at keldix.com
Mon Nov 29 15:29:16 UTC 2010
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 06:01:11PM +0700, hansbkk at gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer at satx.rr.com> wrote:
> >> - I am not at this point overly concerned about performance issues -
> >> reliability/redundancy and ease of recovery are my main priorities.
> > In that case, I'm not sure about your desire for the additional
> > complexity. Someone else suggested RAID6, which from an operational
> > standpoint is much simpler. The main reason, it seems to me, for the more
> > complex topologies would be enhancing perfromance.
> I can see how RAID6 is simpler than RAID10, but compared to RAID1?
Hmm, does not compute by me. RAID1 and RAID10 are the same in complexity,
RAID10 is just a modern RAID1, and should actually have been called
More information about the linux-lvm