[linux-lvm] Resizing underlying LVM partition after cloning to bigger disk
Radu Rendec
radu.rendec at mindbit.ro
Sun Mar 6 12:24:41 UTC 2011
On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 15:13 +1300, Scott Arthur wrote:
> I've been playing around on a test system with a similar partition
> table.
>
>
> Have successfully resized 2 to fill the disk extent. Partition 5
> however proves to be problematic.
>
>
> Using fdisk, I tried deleting 2 and 5 and recreating based on sectors,
> but couldn't recreate 5 on the same starting sector, it told me I was
> out of bounds.
Perhaps there's a (hidden) problem with partition 2 as well: it should
also start on the same sector as it did before deleting/re-creating.
Otherwise it would "push" the beginning of partition 5 by a bunch of
sectors.
> I then tried the same thing with fdisk but with cylinders instead and
> both partitions were recreated okay, but destroyed all my LVM stuff.
It's exactly like Milan Broz said in his earlier post: if the partition
doesn't start at exactly the same location (sector) as it did before,
LVM won't find its metadata at the expected location, thus rendering the
volume unusable.
> I can happily resize 2 using parted but parted wont resize 5.
>
>
> Should I expect to be able to resize 5, or am I missing the point.
> Should I simply be creating a partition 6 to fill the additional space
> opened up by the resizing of partition 2?
Yup, you should create partition 6 to fill the remaining space, then
make it a physical volume and add it to the volume group. At least this
is what I had in mind when I made the other post.
Someone else also suggested simply extending the physical volume. I
haven't done this, but I guess it is also worth looking into it.
However, you should resize the partitions anyway (even if you use this
approach). It's just that you would resize partition 5 instead of
creating partition 6.
>
> On 4 March 2011 21:41, Radu Rendec <radu.rendec at mindbit.ro> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 15:18 -0500, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Mar 2011, Scott Arthur wrote:
> >
> > > Partition Table: msdos
> > >
> > > Number Start End Size Type File system
> Flags
> > > 1 32.3kB 296MB 296MB primary ext4
> boot
> > > 2 296MB 1000GB 1000GB extended
> > > 5 296MB 1000GB 1000GB logical lvm
> > >
> > > I'm obviously wanting to expand the LVM partition to fill
> the remaining 1TB
> > > of space.
> > >
> > > Am I able to simply use parted to resize the partition
> before doing a
> > > pvresize etc?
> > >
> > > Or is it risky to resize the underlying LVM partition?
>
>
> I wouldn't do that. Instead, I would create a new logical
> partition,
> "format" it as lvm physical volume and then extend the volume
> group to
> use this partition as well.
>
> I think this can be safely done like this:
>
> * turn off lvm;
> * note down the exact starting and ending *sector* of
> partition 5 (using
> fdisk -lu)
> * use fdisk and delete partition 5 and 2, then re-create
> partition 2 up
> to the full disk size
> * re-create partition 5 making sure it's on exactly the same
> starting
> and ending sector as it was before
> * create new partition 6
>
> > You are getting to a size where msdos partition tables are
> risky.
> > Don't they crap out at 2TB?
>
>
> They do. But the "2TB" disk is actually 2000GB, which is safe
> (it takes
> more than 2048GB to run into trouble with m$dos partitions).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Radu Rendec
More information about the linux-lvm
mailing list