[linux-lvm] N00b Question: Logical Volume without a Logical Volume Group ?
ygor at comcast.net
Tue Nov 1 19:51:21 UTC 2011
----- Digimer <linux at alteeve.com> wrote:
> On 11/01/2011 03:13 PM, Dan White wrote:
> > ----- Digimer <linux at alteeve.com> wrote:
> >> On 11/01/2011 02:39 PM, Dan White wrote:
> >>> Is a logical volume group necessary before one can start making mountable partitions ?
> >>> I'm trying to work with a SAN. We were allocated a 10Gb LUN to "play" with. Another admin created a logical volume on the LUN and then made a single partition out of the logical volume. The flow I am familiar with from Red Hat's GUI is to first make a logical volume group, then make partitions in the group that I can adjust in size as necessary.
> >>> Are both workflows valid ?
> >> LVs must be created from VGs.
> > I agree. Got a documentation reference I can use for backup ?
> man lvcreate? Not being flippant, but the 'VolumeGroupName' is a
> required value. :)
> Also from the man page;
> lvcreate creates a new logical volume in a volume group ( see vgcre-
> ate(8), vgchange(8) ) by allocating logical extents from the free phys-
> ical extent pool of that volume group. If there are not enough free
> physical extents then the volume group can be extended ( see vgex-
> tend(8) ) with other physical volumes or by reducing existing logical
> volumes of this volume group in size ( see lvreduce(8) ). If you spec-
> ify one or more PhysicalVolumes, allocation of physical extents will be
> restricted to these volumes.
> The second form supports the creation of snapshot logical volumes which
> keep the contents of the original logical volume for backup purposes.
Many thanks. Not at all flippant. Direct and informative.
“Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.”
Bill Waterson (Calvin & Hobbes)
More information about the linux-lvm