[linux-lvm] [PATCH 00/10] Enhancements to a clustered logical volume activation
Vladislav Bogdanov
bubble at hoster-ok.com
Tue Mar 19 17:42:10 UTC 2013
19.03.2013 19:42, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> So what I need is:
>
> Separate out the fixes and minor changes that have no effect on support or
> introduce new constraints on future changes. Get those out of the way.
>
> Then with what's left, sort out the impact in terms of additional support,
> testing, constraints etc. Then work out what the options are.
> E.g. we support multiple lock managers. How do your changes affect
> each of these, including sanlock?
>
> New features should only be available where they are tested and supported:
> if some combination doesn't make sense or won't be tested properly, don't allow
> that combination. In extreme cases, use configure settings as the method of
> control (e.g. if a distro decided it didn't want --node that would need to be a
> configure option). Man pages need to be correct - if an option doesn't work
> with some lock manager, it should say that (or not mention it if under
> configure's control).
Ok.
Do you have any opinion of features themselves or a way they implemented
(as if subject had [RFC} in it)?
More information about the linux-lvm
mailing list