[linux-lvm] Possible bug in expanding thinpool: lvextend doens't expand the top-level dm-linear device

[M.H. Tsai]

2015-12-26 2:37 GMT+08:00 Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac at redhat.com>:
> Dne 25.12.2015 v 03:27 M.H. Tsai napsal(a):
>
> It's not so simple - since the user may activate  thin-pool without
> activation of any thin-volume, and keep thin-pool active while thin-volumes
> are activated and deactivated - so it's different case if user activates
> thin-pool explicitly or thin-pool is activated as thin volume dependency.
>
> Also thin-pool LV has its own cluster lock which is quite complicated to
> explain, but for now -  thin-pool size is unimportant, but it's existence is
> mandatory :)

I