[linux-lvm] Snapshot behavior on classic LVM vs ThinLVM

Gionatan Danti g.danti at assyoma.it
Mon Apr 24 13:49:58 UTC 2017

On 22/04/2017 23:22, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> ATM there is even bug for 169 & 170 - dmeventd should generate message
> at 80,85,90,95,100 - but it does it only once - will be fixed soon...

Mmm... quite a bug, considering how important is monitoring. All things 
considered, what do you feel is the better approach to monitor? It is 
possibile to register for dmevents?

> Not seen metadata error for quite long time...
> Since all the updates are CRC32 protected it's quite solid.

Great! Are the metadata writes somehow jounaled or are written in-place?


Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.danti at assyoma.it - info at assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8

More information about the linux-lvm mailing list